Module 01 demo · ~4 minutes · three parts: the memory layer, the toolbox, and the proof
# Client Project (engagement workspace)
Consulting repo for an AI governance engagement
at a regional health plan. Deliverable drafts,
meeting context, and shared team knowledge.
## Rules
- Client facing docs follow @STYLE.md
- Never modify anything in data/raw/
- Spell out every abbreviation on first use
- Deliverables stay drafts until partner review
# Writing style
- Plain, direct sentences. No corporate filler.
- No em dashes or en dashes.
- Client name appears only as "the health plan".
- Every claim cites its source document.
# Rules for this folder only
- Files are named YYYY-MM-DD-topic.md
- Every deliverable is marked DRAFT until it
has passed a review pass
- Final versions move to deliverables/final/
# Rules for this folder only
- Everything in data/raw/ is read only.
Source files are never edited, ever.
- Cleaned or transformed copies go in
data/processed/ instead.
# Personal preferences
- Keep answers short. Bullets over paragraphs.
- Show me the file diff before saving changes.
.claude/
├── settings.json shared team settings
│ (committed to git)
├── settings.local.json your personal settings
│ (gitignored)
├── commands/ empty, ready for slash commands
├── skills/ empty, ready for skills
└── agents/ empty, ready for subagents
{
"permissions": {
"deny": [
"Read(data/secrets.txt)",
"Read(**/*.pem)"
]
}
}
# deliverables/
Client facing outputs. Drafts live here,
finals in final/. See CLAUDE.md in this
folder for naming and review rules.
This project's conventions:
· Client facing docs follow STYLE.md (plain
sentences, no dashes, sources cited)
· data/raw/ is never modified
· Abbreviations spelled out on first use
· Deliverables stay drafts until partner review
Created deliverables/2026-08-21-weekly-findings.md
Marked DRAFT per this folder's review rule.
Want me to start filling in the findings?
I can't read data/secrets.txt - access to this
file is denied by the project's permission
settings (.claude/settings.json).